Former Vice President Al Gore takes viewers on a transcendent exploration into the devastating consequences of our changing climate. Stand on the Greenland ice and observe the melt as it courses through bright blue rivers and into gaping moulins, as icebergs melt into the ocean.
Participant Media presents This Is Climate Change, directed by Danfung Dennis and Eric Strauss, in association with Condition One.
source
Comments
Official global warming is +1.0 to 1.5 C in the GMST anomaly (Know what that is?) over 140 to 170 years depending on the "expert" and database. 15 C to 16 C is a scary increase of 6.7%.
But “C” does not have thermodynamic substance, “K” does.
Properly cited as 288 K to 289 K, + 0.34%, this difficult to measure change is too trivial to be some kind of dangerous trend.
The current GMST trend is 0.013 C PER YEAR!!! (UAH data) Insignificant! And impossible to actually measure. How is that a “heat wave?”
It's noise in the data, UHI, instrument uncertainty and drift, minor albedo change…….
80% of the surface did/does not even have credible weather data. (Heller)
Some summer engineering interns loaded gobs of garbage data into the computer's maw, spun the algorithm wheel and hurled out a statistical hallucination.
“Analysis of gravity data from GRACE satellites indicates that the Greenland ice sheet lost approximately 2,900 Gt (0.1% of its total mass) between March 2002 and September 2012. The mean mass loss rate for 2008–2012 was 367 Gt/year.”
In the TEN YEARS between 2002 and 2012 Greenland lost 2,900 Gt which represented –
(0.1% of its total mass, 2.8 MILLION Gt) (Yep, read the fine print.)
YES – AN ASTONISHING, NAY STAGGERING EVEN, ZERO POINT 1 PERCENT OF ITS TOTAL MASS!!!!!!!!
Are you effing kidding me? The uncertainty must be 10 times that much.
Who measures this crap and thinks the numbers have substance???
Probably those barely 20 millennials with their participation/entitlement PhDs.
Every year Greenland “loses” 500 Gt during the summer and gains it all back in the winter.
The Earth is cooler with the atmos/GHGs/albedo not warmer.
To perform as advertised the GHGs require “extra” energy upwelling from the surface radiating as a black body. https://youtu.be/0Jijw7-YG-U
The kinetic heat transfer processes of the contiguous atmos molecules render that scenario impossible.
No greenhouse effect, no GHG warming, no man/CO2 driven climate change or Gorebal warming.
Will you refute this or simply delete or leave that to Google’s censorship algorithm??
Version 1.0 081322